From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 17, 1998
720 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2667.

November 17, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gulf County; Robert Moore, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Mark E. Walker, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief in this appeal from Wright's resentencing that was required by our opinion in Wright v. State, 691 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not file a brief pro se. We affirm appellant's sentences and the imposition of costs and a public defender's lien based on our opinion in Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), and certify the question certified in that case: DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 17, 1998
720 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert J. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 17, 1998

Citations

720 So. 2d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Maddox v. State

we disapprove the dicta in both cases that is inconsistent with the definition of fundamental sentencing…

Burch v. State

Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief in this appeal. Appellant was afforded the opportunity but did not…