From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wighard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 14, 2010
34 So. 3d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 5D09-4560.

May 14, 2010.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, James Earp, Judge.

Richard J. Wighard, Monticello, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


AFFIRMED. See Wright v. State, 911 So.2d 81, 83 (Fla. 2005) (holding that imposition of an upward departure sentence without written reasons is not an issue cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) proceeding); Jackson v. State, 29 So.3d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (same); Wood v. State, 830 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (same).

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wighard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 14, 2010
34 So. 3d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Wighard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard WIGHARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 14, 2010

Citations

34 So. 3d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Wighard v. State

On appeal, we concluded the upward departure sentence was not an issue cognizable in a rule 3.800(a)…

Vandyke v. State

Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1196 (Fla.1995), receded from on other grounds, Mack v. State, 823 So.2d 746,…