From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 5, 2001
790 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

stating "[i]f counsel made a tactical decision to abandon the alibi defense, an evidentiary hearing is required to determine whether that was a reasonable strategic choice"

Summary of this case from Button v. State

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-4063

Opinion filed July 5, 2001 Rehearing Denied September 4, 2001

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Marvin Mounts, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 94-13037CFA02.

Adams Wiggins, Bowling Green, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Adam Wiggins appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion. He raised several grounds, including his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call the witness listed on his notice of alibi defense to testify at trial.

The state's response to the motion attached the witness' pre-trial statements. In his statements to the police, he expressed confusion about the date and time of the events to which he would have testified. In his pre-trial deposition, he expressed more confidence in his recollections. The trial court adopted the state's argument that defense counsel made a strategic choice not to call the witness due to his credibility problems.

If counsel made a tactical decision to abandon the alibi defense, an evidentiary hearing is required to determine whether that was a reasonable strategic choice. McMillian v. State, 717 So.2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Anthony v. State, 660 So.2d 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We reverse the order denying the motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing on this allegation only.

STONE, GROSS, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wiggins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 5, 2001
790 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

stating "[i]f counsel made a tactical decision to abandon the alibi defense, an evidentiary hearing is required to determine whether that was a reasonable strategic choice"

Summary of this case from Button v. State

stating "[i]f counsel made a tactical decision to abandon the alibi defense, an evidentiary hearing is required to determine whether that was a reasonable strategic choice"

Summary of this case from Button v. State
Case details for

Wiggins v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADAMS WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 5, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Washington v. State

Anthony v. State, 660 So.2d 374, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (“The determination that defense counsel's actions…

Button v. State

Erlsten v. State, 842 So.2d 967, 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (citations omitted). See also Wiggins v. State, 790…