From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMillian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 19, 1998
717 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-0478.

Opinion filed August 19, 1998. JULY TERM 1998.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Virginia Gay Broome, Judge; L.T. Case No. 94-2383 CF A02.

Joseph McMillian, Arcadia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Barbara Amron Weisberg, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Joseph McMillian appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion in which he raised three allegations of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We affirm the denial of two of the claims. The remaining one was not conclusively disproved by the record and therefore requires an evidentiary hearing.

McMillian was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon, aggravated battery on a person over 65 years, and burglary of a conveyance. He complains that his attorney failed to present the testimony of alibi witness Cheryl Adams, who was listed as a defense witness. McMillian alleges that Ms. Adams would have testified that at the time of the crime, she saw him helping his sister move into her new apartment. If Ms. Adams had so testified, she would have confirmed McMillian's sister's testimony. While two other alibi witnesses testified at trial, neither one could be certain about when they had seen the appellant at his sister's apartment.

The state argues that counsel either made a strategic decision not to call this witness or took reasonable steps to secure her attendance at trial. The record does not clearly support either conclusion, so a hearing is required. Anthony v. State, 660 So.2d 374, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (hearing is usually required to determine whether act or omission was a reasonable strategic choice). We reverse the order denying the motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing on this allegation only. At the hearing, McMillian will have the burden of demonstrating the likelihood that Ms. Adams' testimony would have affected the verdict.

GUNTHER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McMillian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 19, 1998
717 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

McMillian v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph McMILLIAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 19, 1998

Citations

717 So. 2d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Wiggins v. State

If counsel made a tactical decision to abandon the alibi defense, an evidentiary hearing is required to…

Washington v. State

Anthony v. State, 660 So.2d 374, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (“The determination that defense counsel's actions…