From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanstory-Frazier v. CHHS Hospital Company, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3910 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2010)

Summary

holding that plaintiff could pursue interference claim even though she was returned to her position for two weeks before she was fired

Summary of this case from Kibbie v. Hays Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3910.

January 4, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant CHHS Hospital Company, LLC, t/d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hospital (docket no. 11), and plaintiff Monique VanStory-Frazier's response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

Trial in this matter is scheduled for March 1, 2010, at 10:00 a.m.


Summaries of

Vanstory-Frazier v. CHHS Hospital Company, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3910 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2010)

holding that plaintiff could pursue interference claim even though she was returned to her position for two weeks before she was fired

Summary of this case from Kibbie v. Hays Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist.

denying summary judgment in part because the record did not clearly indicate whether an employee's administrative or nonadministrative responsibilities were more important to her employer

Summary of this case from Owens v. CEVA Logistics/TNT
Case details for

Vanstory-Frazier v. CHHS Hospital Company, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MONIQUE VANSTORY-FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 4, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3910 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

Yeh v. Han Dynasty, Inc.

43 Pa Stat. § 333.105(a)(5) (stating that "[e]mployment in the following classifications shall be exempt from…

Vanstory-Frazier v. CHHS Hospital Company

In my prior opinion denying defendant' motion for summary judgment, I not only concluded that defendant had…