From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thames v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 28, 2000
769 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 1D99-1171

Opinion filed September 28, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Kim A. Skievaski, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant appeals the denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which he argues that his sentence is illegal because the trial court improperly retained jurisdiction over his case in violation of Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981). We reverse and remand for further consideration in light of our recent opinion in Hampton v. State, Fla. Law Weekly D1819 (Fla. 1st DCA August 1, 2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Thames v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 28, 2000
769 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Thames v. State

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER THAMES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 28, 2000

Citations

769 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

Based on the supreme court's holdings in Davis and Maddox, we conclude that Wright's challenge to the trial…

Wright v. State

ANSTEAD, J. We have for review the decision in Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which…