From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Molina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2015
Case No. CV 14-7243 FMO (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Summary

In Tate, the district court found: "Since defendant never answered or otherwise appeared in this action, it is unclear whether there would be any genuine dispute of material facts."

Summary of this case from Unicolors, Inc. v. Joy 153, Inc.

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-7243 FMO (AGRx)

01-09-2015

MICHAEL TATE, Plaintiff, v. MARTHA A. MOLINA, et al., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Application for Default Judgment, filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that:

1. Default judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Michael Tate against defendant Martha A. Molina in the amount of $7,735.00 for statutory damages, costs and attorney's fees. The total amount is allocated as follows:

A. Statutory damages in the amount of $4,000.00.



B. Attorney's fees in the amount of $3,315.00.



C. Costs in the amount of $420.00.

2. Plaintiff shall serve defendant with a copy of this Judgment in such a manner as to make it operative in any future proceedings. Dated this 9th day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tate v. Molina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2015
Case No. CV 14-7243 FMO (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

In Tate, the district court found: "Since defendant never answered or otherwise appeared in this action, it is unclear whether there would be any genuine dispute of material facts."

Summary of this case from Unicolors, Inc. v. Joy 153, Inc.

In Tate, the district court found: "Since defendant never answered or otherwise appeared in this action, it is unclear whether there would be any genuine dispute of material facts."

Summary of this case from KCI Newport, Inc. v. Smoke Tokes, LLC

In Tate, the district court found: "Since defendant never answered or otherwise appeared in this action, it is unclear whether there would be any genuine dispute of material facts."

Summary of this case from Federation of Telugu Associations of Southern California v. Telugu Association of Southern California

In Tate, the district court found: "Since defendant never answered or otherwise appeared in this action, it is unclear whether there would be any genuine dispute of material facts."

Summary of this case from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Weems
Case details for

Tate v. Molina

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TATE, Plaintiff, v. MARTHA A. MOLINA, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-7243 FMO (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Weems

The first Eitel factor "considers whether plaintiff will suffer prejudice if default judgment is not…

United States ex rel. Macias v. Pac. Health Corp.

"Under an [Eitel] analysis, [these factors] are often analyzed together." Tate v. Molina, 2015 U.S. Dist.…