From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spataru v. Ramsay

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 7, 2018
239 So. 3d 763 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 3D17–671

03-07-2018

Valentin SPATARU, Appellant, v. Rick RAMSAY, etc., Appellee.

Valentin Spataru, in proper person. Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda & Barranco, P.A., and Gregory J. Jolly (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.


Valentin Spataru, in proper person.

Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda & Barranco, P.A., and Gregory J. Jolly (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LAGOA, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Santa Rosa Cty. v. Administration Com'n, Div. of Admin. Hearings, 661 So.2d 1190, 1193 (Fla. 1995) (observing that "Florida courts will not render, in the form of a declaratory judgment, what amounts to an advisory opinion at the instance of parties who show merely the possibility of legal injury on the basis of a hypothetical ‘state of facts which have not arisen’ and are only ‘contingent, uncertain, [and] rest in the future.’ " (quoting LaBella v. Food Fair, Inc., 406 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) ) (additional citations omitted) ) ); Behm v. Campbell, 925 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that defendant's plea of no contest, accompanied by a withhold of adjudication of guilt, nevertheless established probable cause for the defendant's arrest and precluded a collateral challenge of the legality of that arrest by way of a civil suit for false arrest).


Summaries of

Spataru v. Ramsay

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 7, 2018
239 So. 3d 763 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Spataru v. Ramsay

Case Details

Full title:Valentin SPATARU, Appellant, v. Rick RAMSAY, etc., Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Mar 7, 2018

Citations

239 So. 3d 763 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)