From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 7, 1979
368 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 78-454.

February 7, 1979. Rehearing Denied March 7, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Mark R. McGarry, Jr., J.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Thomas A. McDonald, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant was tried by jury and convicted of assault on a law enforcement officer, sale of marijuana, and possession of more than five grams of marijuana. He was sentenced to one year for the assault and to five years for the possession and sale of marijuana.

The evidence at trial established that appellant merely brought the parties to the drug sale together; there was no evidence that he was ever in actual or constructive possession of the marijuana. Accordingly, the judgment for possession of marijuana cannot stand and must be vacated. Daudt v. State, 368 So.2d 52 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). No other error having been made to appear, the judgment and sentence for assault on a law enforcement officer and the judgment for sale of marijuana are affirmed. Because only a single sentence was entered on both the conviction for sale of marijuana and the conviction for possession of marijuana, the cause is remanded for resentencing on the sale count only. Daudt v. State, supra. Appellant is entitled to be present at resentencing.

GRIMES, C.J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Runge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 7, 1979
368 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Runge v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ROY RUNGE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 7, 1979

Citations

368 So. 2d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

L.J. v. State

Kickasola; cases cited supra note 4. Daudt v. State, 368 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 76…

Priestly v. State

First, proof of possession is not necessary to establish a sale. See, e.g., Runge v. State, 368 So.2d 366…