Summary
holding "partial stay under Colorado River may be appropriate in cases where some, but not all, of a federal plaintiff's claims are pending in a parallel state action"; staying claims "virtually identical" to claims pending in state proceeding, while declining to stay claim within exclusive jurisdiction of federal court
Summary of this case from Riley v. City of RichmondOpinion
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00640-LHK.
February 25, 2011
(Proposed) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
Robert H. Baron, Esq., whose business address and telephone number is Cravath, Swaine Moore LLP, Worldwide Plaza, 825 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10019-7475, and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Qualcomm Incorporated
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.
Dated: February 25, 2011