From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Time, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2020
Case No.: SACV 19-01153-CJC(ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: SACV 19-01153-CJC(ADSx)

03-13-2020

LINDA HALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TIME, INC., MEREDITH CORP., and DOES 1-100, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Linda Hall brings this putative class action against Defendants Time, Inc., Meredith Corp., and unnamed Does. Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim came for consideration before this Court. The Court hereby ORDERS that:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

DATED: March 13, 2020

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hall v. Time, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2020
Case No.: SACV 19-01153-CJC(ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Hall v. Time, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LINDA HALL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2020

Citations

Case No.: SACV 19-01153-CJC(ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Viveros v. Audible Inc.

The court also concludes that Audible's description of its cancellation policy is sufficient under ARL…

In re Amazon Prime Video Litig.

Courts have held that plaintiffs affirmatively consent to all terms when they click a yellow “Buy” or similar…