Gonzalez v. Gonzalez

Full title: MARIO GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. AURORA GONZALEZ, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 23, 2002

834 So. 2d 291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-1922

Opinion filed December 23, 2002.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Marc Schumacher, Judge. L.T. No. 01-26815.

Perez-Abreu Martin-Lavielle and Javier Perez-Abreu and Andy W. Acosta, for appellant.

Maurice Jay Kutner and Rand S. Lieber, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Mario Gonzalez appeals a temporary support order. We conclude that the amount is supported by the record and that the order is sufficiently specific for purposes of review here. See Broadfoot v. Broadfoot, 791 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

The appellant argues that reversal is required by the decision inFleischfresser v. Accursio, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D 2335 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 30, 2002). We disagree. In that case, the trial court's order failed to differentiate between child support and temporary alimony. More particularized findings were needed in order to permit appellate review. There is no child support issue in the present case and, in our view, the record adequately supports the amount awarded.

Affirmed.