From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frances v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
Case No.: 3:09cv411/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:09cv411/MCR/EMT

09-06-2012

JOHN DANIEL FRANCES, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 6, 2012 (doc. 68). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 44) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

_________________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Frances v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
Case No.: 3:09cv411/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Frances v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DANIEL FRANCES, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 3:09cv411/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Parker

Although this decision did not use the term "constructive delivery," its analysis is consistent with the…