From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

English v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 9, 1996
667 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-2934.

February 9, 1996.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Robert K. Mathis, Judge.

Solomon English, Lawtey, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin Compton Jones, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Ten years after a plea of guilty, the defendant appeals the denial of his 3.800 motion. He claims his five-year probationary sentence for his Failure of Defendant on Bail To Appear conviction was illegal. This charge is a third-degree felony if the defendant has failed to appear on felony charges; however, it is only a first-degree misdemeanor if the defendant has failed to appear on misdemeanor charges. The defendant claims he was sentenced under the misdemeanor subsection, section 843.15(1)(b), Florida Statutes, not the felony subsection, section 843.15(1)(a), Florida Statutes. He says that although the underlying charges were aggravated assault and battery he was only convicted of misdemeanors. He misreads the statute. Even if he wasn't convicted of felonies and later pled the offenses down to misdemeanors, he was charged with felonies, and he is governed by section 843.15(1)(a), which states: "If he was released in connection with a charge of felony or while awaiting sentence . . . [he is] guilty of a felony of the third degree. . . ."

While he was properly convicted of the felony charge, there is a typographical error in the record. The judgment properly states he entered a plea of guilty to "Failure To Appear" under " 843.15(1)(a)," a "3F" crime. However, the probation documents are incorrect. Both the "Order Withholding Adjudication of Guilt and Placing Defendant on Probation" and the "Order of Modification of Probation" state that he pled guilty to section 843.15(1)(b), the misdemeanor subsection. Therefore, the typographical error in the probation orders which states that the defendant violated " 843.15(1)(b)" is hereby changed to " 843.15(1)(a)."

CONVICTION and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PROBATION ORDERS CORRECTED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

English v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 9, 1996
667 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

English v. State

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON ENGLISH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 9, 1996

Citations

667 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Hinson v. McDonough

Petitioner did not meet the second provision, but he did meet the first. Moreover, the argument petitioner…