From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Heye

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 5, 1999
743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

dismissing petition for certiorari involving only oral ruling, not written order

Summary of this case from Bank of Am. v. De Morales

Opinion

No. 99-2569.

Opinion filed November 5, 1999.

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Thomas G. Freeman, Judge.

Dana P. Hoffman of Griffin Linder, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.


We dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari because no order was rendered from which certiorari can be taken and vest jurisdiction in this court. The circuit court only pronounced an oral ruling. See State v. Siegel, 662 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also In re Guardianship of A.P., 644 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Gregg v. State, 643 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

DAUKSCH, COBB and SHARP, W., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. Heye

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 5, 1999
743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

dismissing petition for certiorari involving only oral ruling, not written order

Summary of this case from Bank of Am. v. De Morales
Case details for

Davis v. Heye

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH S. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. CAROLYN HEYE, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 5, 1999

Citations

743 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Rich v. State

It is simply impossible for us to meaningfully consider any of the three elements of certiorari relief when…

Holt v. Keetley

See Fla. R. App. P. 9.100(c)(1) ; State v. Maldonado, 156 So.3d 589, 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) ("Because the…