From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craton v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Feb 8, 1943
11 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1943)

Opinion

January 19, 1943 Rehearing Denied February 8, 1943

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County, D.O. Rogers, Judge.

D.C. Laird, for appellant.

J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, and Woodrow M. Melvin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Appeal brings for review judgment of remand in habeas corpus proceedings instituted after trial and conviction.

All matters complained of should have been presented by motion to quash when amendments could have been legally made to meet objections. The information is not void.

We find no reversible error disclosed by the record and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Craton v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Feb 8, 1943
11 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1943)
Case details for

Craton v. Sinclair

Case Details

Full title:W. C. CRATON v. DeWITT SINCLAIR, as Sheriff of Polk County, Florida

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: Feb 8, 1943

Citations

11 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1943)
11 So. 2d 475

Citing Cases

Stack v. State ex Rel. LaFratta

This distinction is to be found in erroneous proceedings as against proceeding without authority of law. See…

Petersen v. Mayo

Defects in an information are not subject to attack in a habeas corpus proceeding unless the defects are of…