From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zurcher v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 15, 1953
97 A.2d 437 (N.J. 1953)

Opinion

Argued June 8, 1953 —

Decided June 15, 1953.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Ervan F. Kushner argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Brenman and Susser, attorneys).

Mr. A. Leo Bohl and Mr. Forster W. Freeman, Jr., argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Freeman, Buttermore Freeman, Mr. Peter Hofstra and Mr. John A. Masiello, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Bigelow in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — Justice HEHER — 1.


Summaries of

Zurcher v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 15, 1953
97 A.2d 437 (N.J. 1953)
Case details for

Zurcher v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GOTTHARD J. ZURCHER, TRADING AS GARAMOUNT MACHINE COMPANY, AND HARRY P…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 15, 1953

Citations

97 A.2d 437 (N.J. 1953)
97 A.2d 437

Citing Cases

Ertag v. Haines

Furthermore an assignee (at least one for value) is a "real party in interest." Zurcher v. Modern Plastic…

Bridges Financial Group, Inc. v. Beech Hill Co., Inc.

See Gerrold v. Penn Title Ins. Co., 271 N.J. Super. 50, 54 (App. Div. 1994) (explaining that "[a]n assignee…