From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ZIMMERMANN v. BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts, Springfield Division
Apr 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-30190 (D. Mass. Apr. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-30190.

April 23, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiffs Andrew Zimmermann and Kelly Zimmermann ("the Zimmermanns") have moved pursuant to Rules 41(a)(2) and 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss all claims against Kostin, Ruffkess Company, LLC ("Kostin") from this action, without prejudice. Upon consideration whereof, and finding the consent of Kostin and good cause so to do, the Court hereby approves the motion and ADJUDGES ORDERS AND DECREES that the Zimmermanns' claims against Kostin are dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own taxable costs.


Summaries of

ZIMMERMANN v. BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts, Springfield Division
Apr 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-30190 (D. Mass. Apr. 23, 2010)
Case details for

ZIMMERMANN v. BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW ZIMMERMANN and KELLY ZIMMERMANN, as class representatives for the…

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts, Springfield Division

Date published: Apr 23, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:09-cv-30190 (D. Mass. Apr. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Zimmermann v. Epstein Becker and Green, P.C

Both the attorneys and the accountants filed motions to dismiss. Ultimately, the district judge dismissed…

Silverman Neu, LLP v. Admiral Insurance

Plaintiff Silverman Neu, LLP (“Silverman”), as successor to Chipetine, Neu & Silverman, LLC (“CNS”)…