From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zequeira v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 1996
671 So. 2d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Case No. 95-1034.

April 10, 1996.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robbie M. Barr, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Maria A. Berry, Specially Appointed Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.


Luis Zequeira, the defendant, was found guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender to fifteen years imprisonment with a ten year minimum mandatory term. At sentencing, the trial court indicated it was imposing the sentence because it believed the minimum mandatory requirement was not discretionary. This is incorrect.

Sentencing under the habitual offender statute as well as the imposition of minimum mandatory terms is permissive, not mandatory. Walsingham v. State, 602 So.2d 1297 (Fla. 1992); Daniels v. State, 634 So.2d 187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Accordingly, we remand the case for resentencing. In all other respects, the judgment below is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

Zequeira v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 10, 1996
671 So. 2d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Zequeira v. State

Case Details

Full title:LUIS JACINTO ZEQUEIRA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 10, 1996

Citations

671 So. 2d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Morales

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Burdick v. State, 594 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1992); State v. Eason, 592 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1992);…

Hudson v. State

However, this affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to again challenge his sentence should the…