Zambrano v. State

Full title: Giancarlo ZAMBRANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

335 So. 3d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1600

11-03-2021

Giancarlo ZAMBRANO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Adams v. State, 630 So. 2d 641, 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (holding that a jury instruction for resisting officer without violence that named the law enforcement officer was error but not fundamental error); Starks v. State, 627 So. 2d 1194, 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (" ‘It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.’ ") (quoting Ray v. State, 403 So. 2d 956, 960 (Fla. 1981) (citation and emphasis omitted)).