From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Youngblood v. Prudential Ins. Co.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 11, 2010
706 F. Supp. 2d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

Opinion

NO. 3:09-0303.

February 11, 2010.

Peter T. Skeie, Nashville, TN, for Linda Youngblood.

G. Brian Jackson, David L. Johnson, Miller Martin, LLP, Nashville, TN, for Prudential Ins. Co.


ORDER


Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 27). Plaintiff has filed Objections (Docket No. 28) and Defendant has filed a Response (Docket No. 29). Plaintiff has also filed a Reply (Docket No. 32).

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Objections, Response and Reply. The objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 27) is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 18) and Motion to Extend the Initial Case Management Deadline to Amend Pleadings (Docket No. 23) are denied for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Dispositive Motion Deadline (Docket No. 17) is granted and the case is referred to the Magistrate Judge to set a new dispositive motion deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Summaries of

Youngblood v. Prudential Ins. Co.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 11, 2010
706 F. Supp. 2d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)
Case details for

Youngblood v. Prudential Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Linda YOUNGBLOOD v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2010

Citations

706 F. Supp. 2d 831 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

Citing Cases

Post v. Trinity Health-Mich.

Defendants propose one possibility: discriminatory animus. To support this claim, they cite Youngblood v.…

Vazquez v. Municipality of Juncos

Furthermore, in order to claim that a defendant interfered with an individual's enjoyment and exercise of…