From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 1, 1981
397 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-570.

April 1, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sumter County, John W. Booth, J.

Harold Young, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Young appeals the denial of his motion for post conviction relief. Several grounds were raised in a motion including ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial judge denied the motion holding these issues had been considered on direct appeal. However, the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel had not been raised prior to the 3.850 motion. Denial of effective assistance of counsel is an issue appropriate for collateral relief. Gunn v. State, 378 So.2d 105 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We remand this case for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. Battle v. State, 388 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Dismuke v. State, 388 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, C.J., and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., concur.


Summaries of

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 1, 1981
397 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 1, 1981

Citations

397 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

See Vaught v. State, 442 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1983); McMillian v. State, 411 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).…

Morman v. State

Cases are legion which hold that where a 3.850 motion is not insufficient on its face, and the trial judge…