From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young-Maile v. Maile

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 24, 2002
813 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-3777.

April 24, 2002.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. CD 00-86 FB.

Brian J. Cooke and Kristina M. Candido of Arnstein Lehr, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

William G. Shofstall, Jr. of The Law Offices of William G. Shofstall, Jr., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order that denied appellant's rule 1.540 motion. We find competent, substantial evidence in the record to establish appellee's intent and presence within the State of Florida for the six months that preceded his filing of the petition for dissolution of marriage. See § 61.021, Fla. Stat. (1999) (to obtain a dissolution of marriage, one of the parties to the marriage must reside six months in the state before the filing of the petition); Jenkins v. Jenkins, 556 So.2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1279 (1990); see also Hunter v. Hunter, 736 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

KLEIN, STEVENSON, JJ., and DELL, JOHN W., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Young-Maile v. Maile

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 24, 2002
813 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Young-Maile v. Maile

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA E. YOUNG-MAILE, Appellant, v. DENNIS P. MAILE, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 24, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)