From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wynn v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 4, 1993
625 A.2d 1379 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14788)

Decided June 4, 1993


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 803 (AC 11170), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations defense was a threshold issue which the trial court could decide without referring the same to the arbitrators in light of the positive assurance test for arbitrability and General Statutes 52-410?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of the plaintiff's application to compel arbitration?"


David C. Pite, in support of the petition.

Frederick L. Murolo, in opposition.


Summaries of

Wynn v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jun 4, 1993
625 A.2d 1379 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

Wynn v. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEDRA WYNN v. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 4, 1993

Citations

625 A.2d 1379 (Conn. 1993)
625 A.2d 1379

Citing Cases

Wynn v. Metropolitan Property Casualty Ins. Co.

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issues: "1. Did the…

Johnson v. Connecticut Ins.

The Supreme Court granted certification, inter alia, on the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court…