From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 13, 1991
589 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding that since the defendant was being held in Martin County jail on new charges when Palm Beach County issued a detainer and the Palm Beach County sentence was to run concurrent with the Martin County sentence, the defendant was entitled to credit for the time spent in Martin County on the Palm Beach sentence, unless the records refuted the defendant's allegations

Summary of this case from Price v. State

Opinion

No. 91-2176.

November 13, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Thomas E. Sholts, J.

John Angus Wright, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


John Angus Wright appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant claims 754 days entitlement to jail time credit for time he served in the Martin County jail from September 3, 1986 until his sentencing on September 27, 1988. The trial court credited him with only 520 days. Appellant contends that since he was incarcerated in the Martin County jail when the detainer was issued by Palm Beach County, and since the sentences in Palm Beach County were to run concurrent with the sentence in Martin County, he is entitled to credit for the entire time served.

The trial court summarily denied his motion and did not attach the portions of the record which conclusively refute appellant's claim that he was confined in the Martin County jail when the September 3, 1986 detainer was issued by Palm Beach County. While appellant's calculations may not be perfectly accurate, it nonetheless remains clear that the order denying jail time credit did not attach adequate portions of the record to refute his claims. We therefore reverse and remand this case to the trial court for attachment of the portions of the record refuting appellant's claim for post conviction relief or in the alternative, for resentencing. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1986) and Pearson v. State, 538 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 13, 1991
589 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

holding that since the defendant was being held in Martin County jail on new charges when Palm Beach County issued a detainer and the Palm Beach County sentence was to run concurrent with the Martin County sentence, the defendant was entitled to credit for the time spent in Martin County on the Palm Beach sentence, unless the records refuted the defendant's allegations

Summary of this case from Price v. State

In Wright, 589 So.2d at 382, the defendant was held in Martin County jail on new charges when Palm Beach County issued a detainer.

Summary of this case from Price v. State
Case details for

Wright v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ANGUS WRIGHT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 13, 1991

Citations

589 So. 2d 382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Price v. State

The Pearson court made no distinction based on the fact that the two sentences were imposed by different…

Worthy v. State

The state concedes that the case must be remanded to the lower court so that the lower court can attach a…