From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wormser Corp. v. L'Ore´al USA, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2022
205 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

15896 Index No. 654901/20 Case No. 2021–02575

05-10-2022

WORMSER CORPORATION, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. L'ORE´AL USA, INC., Defendant–Respondent.

Kagen Caspersen & Bogart PLLC, New York (Russell L. Bogart of counsel), for appellant. K & L Gates LLP, New York (Anthony P. La Rocco of counsel), for respondent.


Kagen Caspersen & Bogart PLLC, New York (Russell L. Bogart of counsel), for appellant.

K & L Gates LLP, New York (Anthony P. La Rocco of counsel), for respondent.

Webber, J.P., Singh, Moulton, Kennedy, Rodriguez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.) entered on or about June 8, 2021, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion denied.

Plaintiff (Wormser) asserts a claim for breach of the forum selection clause contained in the parties’ agreement, which requires disputes to be brought before the courts of New York City, and for attorneys’ fees incurred in the actions that defendant (L'Ore´al) brought against it in New Jersey. After the New Jersey court had dismissed its complaint "with prejudice within the jurisdiction of New Jersey," L'Ore´al commenced an action against Wormser in Supreme Court, New York County. Subsequently, a New Jersey appellate court amended the New Jersey trial court's orders to make the dismissal "without prejudice" ( L'Ore´al USA, Inc. v. Wormser Corp., 2021 WL 1217872, *2, 2021 NJ Super Unpub LEXIS 540, *4 [N.J. Super. Ct., App.Div., Mar. 31, 2021] ), and Wormser brought this action.

Wormser's claim is not barred by the doctrine of res judicata, because the dismissal was without prejudice by the New Jersey appellate court and therefore was not a final determination on the merits (see id. ["A dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to a forum selection clause requiring suit to be brought in some other jurisdiction is not an adjudication on the merits"]; see also Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross, 11 N.Y.3d 8, 13, 862 N.Y.S.2d 316, 892 N.E.2d 380 [2008] ["a dismissal ‘without prejudice’ lacks a necessary element of res judicata—by its terms such a judgment is not a final determination on the merits"]).

Wormser's claim for attorneys’ fees may proceed, as "damages may be obtained for breach of a forum selection clause, and an award of such damages does not contravene the American rule that deems attorneys’ fees a mere incident of litigation" ( Indosuez Intl. Fin. v. National Reserve Bank, 304 A.D.2d 429, 431, 758 N.Y.S.2d 308 [1st Dept. 2003] [internal citations omitted]).


Summaries of

Wormser Corp. v. L'Ore´al USA, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 10, 2022
205 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Wormser Corp. v. L'Ore´al USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WORMSER CORPORATION, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. L'ORE´AL USA, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

205 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
165 N.Y.S.3d 844

Citing Cases

Shutvet v. Massa

Plaintiffs are correct in their argument that an order dismissing an action without prejudice is not a final…

Hous. & Redevelopment Ins. Exch. v. Guy Carpenter & Co.

Such a claim must be brought by counterclaim or by separate action for breach of contract. See, e.g.,…