From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 23, 2014
148 So. 3d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 1D13–5829.

10-23-2014

Trimeka Shanta WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee; Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufrano, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee; Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufrano, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, Ms. Trimeka Wood challenges her sentence based on the trial judge's statement that her sentence was based, in part, on her “continued denial of any culpability.” Our precedents make clear that a sentence conditioned, even in part, on a defendant's “lack of remorse and claim of innocence” violates due process and warrants remand for resentencing before a new judge. Adkinson v. State, 133 So.3d 607, 607 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) ; Dumas v. State, 134 So.3d 1048, 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ; Jackson v. State, 39 So.3d 427, 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ; Ritter v. State, 885 So.2d 413, 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Accordingly, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for resentencing before a new judge.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 23, 2014
148 So. 3d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Wood v. State

Case Details

Full title:Trimeka Shanta WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Oct 23, 2014

Citations

148 So. 3d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

For these reasons, we can no longer embrace the blanket, judge-made rule that when it comes to sentencing,…

Anderson v. Sec'y Dep't of Corr.

, a trial court generally could not consider or use against a defendant his assertion of innocence, refusal…