From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Geno

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 21, 1982
332 N.W.2d 457 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

Docket No. 59696.

Decided December 21, 1982. Leave to appeal applied for.

Roy DeGesero, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for plaintiff.

Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and M.J. KELLY and W.S. WHITE, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


Plaintiff brought this paternity action against defendant on March 3, 1981, on behalf of her child, who was born on February 2, 1973. Defendant denied paternity and moved for accelerated judgment, raising the six-year statute of limitations, MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b). Following a hearing, the trial court granted defendant's motion and dismissed plaintiff's action. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

We reject plaintiff's argument that the limitation period of the paternity act, six years, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the state and federal constitutions. Shifter v Wolf, 120 Mich. App. 182; 327 N.W.2d 429 (1982).

Further, under the clear language of the statute, an acknowledgment of paternity by a defendant must be "in writing" in order to toll the running of the limitation period. MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Geno

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 21, 1982
332 N.W.2d 457 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Geno

Case Details

Full title:WOLFE v GENO

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 21, 1982

Citations

332 N.W.2d 457 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982)
332 N.W.2d 457

Citing Cases

Wolfe v. Geno

The trial court granted defendant's motion for accelerated judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 116.1(5), on the…

Frazier v. Castellani

Plaintiff also claims that the six-year limitation period of the Paternity Act violates the Equal Protection…