From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 6, 2008
983 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

accepting state's concession to defendant's claim that his “allocution rights” were violated when court did not give him opportunity to speak or present evidence at sentencing

Summary of this case from Jean-Baptiste v. State

Opinion

No. 5D08-41.

June 6, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge.

Daniel S. Ciener and Terry L. Locy, of Law Firm of Daniel S. Ciener, Merritt Island, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


William Witt appeals the sentences entered against him after his violation of probation. He argues that his allocution rights were violated because the court never gave him an opportunity to speak or present evidence at the sentencing hearing. The State concedes error and the record reveals that Witt never had an opportunity to offer evidence or make a statement to the court, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720. Accordingly, we reverse Witt's sentences and remand for a new sentencing hearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., and EVANDER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Witt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 6, 2008
983 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

accepting state's concession to defendant's claim that his “allocution rights” were violated when court did not give him opportunity to speak or present evidence at sentencing

Summary of this case from Jean-Baptiste v. State
Case details for

Witt v. State

Case Details

Full title:William G. WITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 6, 2008

Citations

983 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Jean-Baptiste v. State

The Fifth District also reversed a sentence where the record revealed that the defendant never had the…