From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Withrow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 18, 2009
21 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 4D09-938.

November 18, 2009.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 2007CF010460AXX

James Withrow, Estill, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Appellant's motions for post conviction relief were dismissed by the trial court for lack of proper oaths. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 1985). The orders did not permit amendment, contrary to the procedures announced in Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007). However, we affirm the dismissal, which we will treat as a denial in these circumstances, because appellant did subsequently file motions with proper oaths, and more importantly, because his motions are without merit on their substance grounds. See Gusow v. State, 6 So.3d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); see also Major v. State, 814 So.2d 424 (Fla. 2002) (holding that neither the trial court nor defense counsel has any duty to advise a defendant entering a plea that the plea may have sentencing enhancing consequences on a sentence imposed for a crime committed in the future).

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Withrow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 18, 2009
21 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Withrow v. State

Case Details

Full title:James WITHROW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 18, 2009

Citations

21 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)