From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Windfield v. Hughey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 14, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-2607-K (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-2607-K

12-14-2016

RANDY I. WINDFIELD, #2075290 Plaintiff, v. RHONDA HUGHEY, District Clerk Kaufman County, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiffs filed objections on December 12, 2016, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' objections filed on December 12, 2016, are OVERRULED.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of the Notice of Seizure and Intended Forfeiture, Doc. 13 at 4, to Plaintiff per his request since it is his only copy.

SO ORDERED

Signed December 14th, 2016.

/s/_________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Windfield v. Hughey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 14, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-2607-K (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Windfield v. Hughey

Case Details

Full title:RANDY I. WINDFIELD, #2075290 Plaintiff, v. RHONDA HUGHEY, District Clerk…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-2607-K (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2016)

Citing Cases

Doggins v. Green

"[I]nferior federal courts lack subject-matter jurisdiction over cases that effectively seek review of…