From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 10, 2003
853 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-1078

Opinion filed September 10, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; James I. Cohn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-10620 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Robert Wilson appeals his attempted armed robbery and armed robbery convictions. We affirm the convictions. With respect to Wilson's sentence for count I, however, the State has conceded that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the 3.800(b)(2) motion more than sixty days after such motion was filed absent the timely filing of a motion for extension of time. See Edmond v. State, 832 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Jackson v. State, 793 So.2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We, therefore, reverse the sentence imposed for count I and remand for the entry of a new sentencing order.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

WARNER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 10, 2003
853 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 10, 2003

Citations

853 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Maestas v. State

Pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2), the motion is deemed denied and the subsequent order on the motion is a…