From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 9, 2013
118 So. 3d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2D12–3050.

2013-08-9

Eric WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal pursuant to Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Susan Gardner, Judge.
Eric Wilson, pro se.

SLEET, Judge.

Eric Wilson appeals the order summarily denying his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm in all respects except with regard to Wilson's claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and depose James Thompson and Bruce Warren, who were listed in the defense notice of alibi. Wilson's claim was facially insufficient because it failed to allege that these witnesses were available to testify. See Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 584 (Fla.2004) (holding that to establish prejudice from counsel's failure to call a witness, a movant must allege that the witness would have been available to testify).

Accordingly, we reverse the postconviction court's order insofar as it denied this claim and remand with directions for the court to allow Wilson thirty days to amend this claim if he can do so in good faith. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 762 (Fla.2007). The order is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

VILLANTI and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 9, 2013
118 So. 3d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Wilson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 9, 2013

Citations

118 So. 3d 959 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)