From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 1, 1999
744 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1133.

Opinion filed December 1, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, T. Michael Jones, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Bart Schneider, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Cecil Ray Willis appeals his sentence imposed after violation of probation, arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to resentence him as a youthful offender. Under section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1997), a trial court may impose a non-youthful offender sentence on a youthful offender who commits violations of probation that involve new substantive offenses. See Hill v. State, 692 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Dunbar v. State, 664 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Johnson v. State, 678 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Here, appellant violated his probation by committing two new substantive offenses. Thus, the trial court was not limited to a youthful offender sentence. Id. Accordingly, we affirm.

LAWRENCE, DAVIS AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 1, 1999
744 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Willis v. State

Case Details

Full title:CECIL RAY WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 1, 1999

Citations

744 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Schneider v. State

Before 1985 and after 1990, a trial court could impose an adult sanction on a youthful offender who violated…

Kelly v. State

Affirmed. See Mendenhall v. State, 999 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Yasin v. State, 896 So. 2d 875 (Fla.…