From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 18, 1994
630 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2542.

January 18, 1994.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Barbara S. Levenson, Judge.

Chey Lamont Williams, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.


Chey Lamont Williams appeals an order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion as untimely. A review of the record reveals that the state's confession of error is well-taken. Williams filed his motion within the period set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b), which states that such motion must be filed within "two years after the judgment and sentence become final." Williams' judgment and sentence became final upon issuance of this court's July 28, 1992, mandate on the direct appeal. Williams v. State, 601 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Therefore, the Rule 3.850 motion filed on August 10, 1993, is timely. Jones v. State, 602 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Miller v. State, 601 So.2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Cook v. State, 596 So.2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); see Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 1990). We reverse the order and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 18, 1994
630 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHEY LAMONT WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 18, 1994

Citations

630 So. 2d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)