From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 16, 1983
435 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. AO-211.

June 30, 1983. Rehearing Denied August 16, 1983.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Union County; Chester B. Chance, Judge.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Gwendolyn Spivey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We do not reach the merits of appellant's complaint concerning the testimony received on the subject of appellant's prior sale of marijuana because, though the belated objection was sustained, no motion to strike was made. See Leonard v. State, 423 So.2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We find no other error in the record except that the judgment inadvertently adjudges appellant to be guilty of a violation of section 944.43, Florida Statutes (1981), rather than section 944.47, which proscribes the offense laid in the information. The judgment is amended accordingly and as amended it is

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 16, 1983
435 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE WILLIAMS, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 16, 1983

Citations

435 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Sinclair v. Wainwright

The procedural default defense here has two aspects. First, the State insists that Sinclair was in procedural…