From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 30, 2004
873 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 5D02-3468.

Opinion Filed April 30, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Shawn L. Briese, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patrick W. Krechowski, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.



Of the various issues raised on appeal, only one merits discussion.

Calvin Williams was convicted of trafficking in cocaine between 200 and 400 grams. His sentence included a seven year mandatory minimum term for drug trafficking, which he argues violates the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the Florida and United States Constitutions.

In Chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, the Legislature enacted provisions creating, inter alia, mandatory minimum prison terms for certain drug trafficking offenses. In Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), the Second District Court of Appeal held Chapter 99-188 unconstitutional for violating the single subject requirement. In response to Taylor, the Legislature enacted Chapters 2002-208 through 2002-212, Laws of Florida, to cure the single subject problem in Chapter 99-188. The Legislature provided that the provisions in these chapters reenacting portions of Chapter 99-188 would apply retroactively from July 1, 1999.

Against this backdrop, Williams argues Chapter 2002-212, which took effect after the offense date in this case, cannot be retroactively applied. This Court recently, in Jones v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D747 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 26, 2004), by a unanimous en banc decision, receded from its earlier decision in Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Based on the rationale of Jones, we conclude that the retroactive application of Chapter 99-188 is an impermissible violation of the Ex Post Facto Clauses of the federal and Florida Constitutions.

Accordingly, we strike the seven year mandatory minimum provision in Williams' sentence. See Anderson v. State, 690 So.2d 749 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

MANDATORY MINIMUM TERM STRICKEN; AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 30, 2004
873 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 30, 2004

Citations

873 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

On April 30, 2004, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed Petitioner's convictions but struck the…