From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Maddren

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 21, 1962
147 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

Opinion

No. 3128.

November 30, 1962. Rehearing Denied December 21, 1962.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Martin County, C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, J.

Carroll Dunscombe, Stuart, for appellant.

Thomas H. Thurlow, Stuart, for appellees.


This court, as to the present appeal, raises sua sponte the question of appealability of an order emanating from a case on the law side and sought to be reviewed. A motion for summary judgment was filed by defendants, supported by affidavit with exhibits and opposed by affidavit of plaintiff. No genuine issue of any material fact was found to exist by the trial court under the pleadings and an order granting defendants' motion was entered. The decretal part of the order reads: "The Motion for Summary Judgment upon the Complaint and Answer filed herein by the Defendants be and the same is hereby granted."

The appeal is taken from this order entered February 6, 1962, and recorded February 9, 1962. No final judgment has been entered consequent upon the order granting the motion; the order itself is not a final adjudication and so is nonappealable. See Stone v. Buckley, Fla.App. 1960, 119 So.2d 298, 299. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

SHANNON, C.J., KANNER, J., and SCOTT, CHARLES R., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Maddren

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 21, 1962
147 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)
Case details for

Williams v. Maddren

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM T. MADDREN ET UX., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 21, 1962

Citations

147 So. 2d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

Citing Cases

Palardy v. Igrec

We have studied the order of redemption and conclude that the appellants are correct. It is a non-final order…