From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Florida Dept of Commerce

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 18, 1979
374 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 79-118.

September 18, 1979.

Appeal from the Division of Employment Security.

Stephen T. Maher, Miami, for appellant.

James R. Parks and John L. Briscoe, Tallahassee, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ.


This is an appeal from the affirmance of an Appeals Referee's order holding the appellant disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits because of "misconduct connected with [her] work." Section 443.06(1), Florida Statutes (1977). The record reveals that the referee denied the employee her basic right to the compulsory attendance of witnesses by declining to issue subpoenas for the persons she wished to call at the hearing. On the authority of Spiegel v. Lavis Plumbing Services, 373 So.2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) and Drogaris v. Martine's Inc., 118 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), we reverse the order below and remand for a new hearing before which, as in Spiegel, the appellant may "subpoena any witness [she] desires."

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Williams v. Florida Dept of Commerce

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 18, 1979
374 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Williams v. Florida Dept of Commerce

Case Details

Full title:VEOLA B. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 18, 1979

Citations

374 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

O'Blenis v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security

Appellant raises numerous points, but we find it necessary to consider only one which requires reversal. It…

Ibarra v. Unempl. Appeals Com'n

[1, 2] An employee in an unemployment compensation matter has a basic right to the compulsory attendance of…