From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 19, 2013
147 So. 3d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Summary

holding defendant's prior conviction for grand theft was a qualifying offense for purposes of HFO sentencing even though adjudication of guilt on the grand theft charge was withheld and defendant had completed the sentence before committing the offense for which he was currently being sentenced

Summary of this case from Sanchez v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Opinion

No. 1D12–4650.

2013-09-19

Jonathan M. WHITMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Jonathan M. Whitmore, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brittany Ann Rhodaback, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.



Jonathan M. Whitmore, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brittany Ann Rhodaback, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Jonathan M. Whitmore appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 asserting that his Habitual Felony Offender (“HFO”) sentence for burglary of a dwelling is illegal because he has only one prior qualifying conviction. See§ 775.084(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010) (a defendant must have two or more prior felony convictions for HFO status). Specifically, Whitmore contends that one of the two convictions used to habitualize him does not qualify as a prior conviction because, adjudication of guilt was withheld, and he had completed the one-year county jail sentence before committing the current offense. We disagree, and affirm.

In 2009, Whitmore entered a negotiated plea of guilty to grand theft; the trial court withheld adjudication of guilt and imposed twelve months' unsupervised probation, with a special condition that Whitmore serve twelve months in the county jail. “[T]he placing of a person on probation or community control without an adjudication of guilt shall be treated as a prior conviction” for purposes of qualifying the person for HFO sentencing. § 775.084(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). Further, a defendant qualifies as HFO if he or she committed the current offense within five years of the date of conviction of the last prior felony. § 775.084(1)(a)2.b., Fla. Stat. (2010). Whitmore's grand theft conviction occurred in 2009; he committed burglary of a dwelling in 2010. Because Whitmore satisfied the criteria for HFO sentencing, the postconviction court correctly denied his 3.800 motion.

AFFIRMED. PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whitmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 19, 2013
147 So. 3d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

holding defendant's prior conviction for grand theft was a qualifying offense for purposes of HFO sentencing even though adjudication of guilt on the grand theft charge was withheld and defendant had completed the sentence before committing the offense for which he was currently being sentenced

Summary of this case from Sanchez v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
Case details for

Whitmore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan M. WHITMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 19, 2013

Citations

147 So. 3d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.

A defendant qualifies as HFO if he or she committed the current offense within five years of the date of…