Summary
reversing upward departure under § 5K2.8 where wire fraud defendant inflicted no physical injury
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BakerOpinion
No. 93-1626
September 21, 1994.
Appeal from the E.D.Mich.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
WHITFIELD v. BIC CORP
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 21, 1994
36 F.3d 1098 (6th Cir. 1994)
Summaries of
WHITFIELD v. BIC CORP
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 21, 1994
36 F.3d 1098 (6th Cir. 1994)
reversing upward departure under § 5K2.8 where wire fraud defendant inflicted no physical injury
Summary of this case from U.S. v. BakerIn United States v. Cook, 36 F.3d 1098, 1994 WL 514528, *4 (6th Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an uncounseled misdemeanor conviction that resulted in a sentence of one day time served was not properly considered in calculating federal sentencing guidelines.
Summary of this case from Gaona v. Maclarendisallowing sentencing enhancement based upon a prior uncounseled conviction where the defendant received a one-day sentence that was satisfied through credit for time served
Summary of this case from Roosevelt City v. CurryCase details for
WHITFIELD v. BIC CORP
Case Details
Full title:Whitfield v. Bic Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Sep 21, 1994
Citations
36 F.3d 1098 (6th Cir. 1994)
Citing Cases
Sampson v. City of Xenia
United States v. Wrice, 954 F.2d 406, 411 (6th Cir. 1992), modified on other grounds by United States v.…
U.S. v. WhiteHanserd, 123 F.3d at 933; United States v. Sarduy, 838 F.2d 157, 158 (6th Cir. 1988) (challenge to proper…