From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 13, 1982
408 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1639.

January 13, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, John S. Andrews, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant contends that the court should have given him credit for the period of time he was in custody pursuant to his commitment as a mentally disordered sex offender under Chapter 917. We agree. § 917.014(1), Fla. Stat. (1979); See McGuirk v. State, 382 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Section 917.014(2) had provided that "the provisions of this section shall stand repealed on July 1, 1981." However, Chapter 81-293, Laws of Florida, amends section 917.014(2) to provide that "the provisions of this section shall stand repealed on July 1, 1983." Thus, section 917.014(1) was in full force and effect on July 6, 1981, the date of appellant's sentencing.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but remand the cause with directions that the court give appellant credit for the time he spent in the mentally disordered sex offender program.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 13, 1982
408 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK E. WHITE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 13, 1982

Citations

408 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

As he was free to come and go as he pleased except for the special conditions of his probation, we affirm the…