From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 26, 2001
802 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-1435

Opinion filed December 26, 2001.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 00-28775.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas and Carlos Gonzalez, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Steven R. Berger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.


Affirmed. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1996) (holding that to effect an investigatory stop, a police officer need only have a founded suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime); Saturnino-Boudel v. State, 682 So.2d 188, 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that founded suspicion needed to justify investigatory stop is fact specific to each case and based on totality of circumstances as viewed by an experienced police officer); Jones v. State, 758 So.2d 722, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that "under `inevitable discovery' doctrine, evidence obtained as the result of an unlawful search is admissible if the evidence would ultimately have been discovered by legal means.").


Summaries of

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 26, 2001
802 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ANDRE WHITE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 26, 2001

Citations

802 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)