From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whipple v. Dawson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 14, 2021
322 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-0981

07-14-2021

Juan D. WHIPPLE, Appellant, v. Crystal Ferguson DAWSON, et al., Appellees.

Juan D. Whipple, in proper person. William C. Robinson, for appellees.


Juan D. Whipple, in proper person.

William C. Robinson, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's appeal from the order determining homestead status of real property is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the final order was not timely appealed. See Steele v. Brown, 197 So. 3d 106, 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding that order determining homestead status "constituted an appealable, final order"). The remaining orders on appeal are affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 986 So. 2d 501, 513 (Fla. 2008) ("To be preserved, the issue or legal argument must be raised and ruled on by the trial court.") (alteration in original); John Moriarty & Assocs. of Fla., Inc. v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp., 272 So. 3d 464, 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("In the absence of a transcript of the lower court proceedings, and finding no legal error apparent on the face of the order ... we cannot conclude the trial court erred in rendering the order under review and therefore affirm."); N & D Holding, Inc. v. Town of Davie, 17 So. 3d 819, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ("It is the appellant's duty to point out where in the record the alleged error can be substantiated.").

Dismissed in part, affirmed in part.


Summaries of

Whipple v. Dawson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 14, 2021
322 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Whipple v. Dawson

Case Details

Full title:Juan D. WHIPPLE, Appellant, v. Crystal Ferguson DAWSON, et al., Appellees.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

322 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)