From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 1, 1981
158 Ga. App. 434 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

61458.

DECIDED MAY 1, 1981.

Action on note. Hall State Court. Before Judge Smith.

James A. Glenn, Jr., for appellant.

Edmund A. Waller, for appellee.


Appellant Wheeler's appeal arises from a judgment against him on a promissory note executed by the appellee Dorsey in partial payment of the purchase by Dorsey of a used car from Wheeler. Dorsey answered denying the indebtedness and filed compulsory counterclaims alleging violations of the federal truth in lending and odometer statutes. Following a jury trial, the jury found for Dorsey on the note and also for violations of both federal statutes. The verdict of the jury was made the judgment of the court. Wheeler brings an appeal alleging only the general grounds. Held:

Although the evidence was disputed, there was evidence presented to the jury to warrant its verdict of violations of the federal statutes and an off-set of the amount due on the note. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 36 of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed. Shulman, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 1, 1981.


Summaries of

Wheeler v. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 1, 1981
158 Ga. App. 434 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Wheeler v. Dorsey

Case Details

Full title:WHEELER v. DORSEY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 1, 1981

Citations

158 Ga. App. 434 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
280 S.E.2d 842

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Cmty. & S. Bank.

But the general rule does not apply where the guarantor has waived his right to assert those defenses.…

Zampatti v. Tradebank Intl. Franchising Corp.

A motion to strike is the proper procedure to attack untimely filed affidavits. See Vickers v. Chrysler…