From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheat v. Washington

U.S.
Jun 17, 1968
392 U.S. 652 (1968)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.

No. 1301, Misc.

Decided June 17, 1968.

Together with No. 1535, Misc., Aiken v. Washington, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Certiorari granted; 72 Wn.2d 306, 434 P.2d 10, vacated and remanded.

Charles M. Stokes for petitioner in No. 1301, Misc. Anthony Savage, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1535, Misc.

James E. Kennedy for respondent in both cases.



The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK's dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 532, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE's dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 540, and Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138.


Summaries of

Wheat v. Washington

U.S.
Jun 17, 1968
392 U.S. 652 (1968)
Case details for

Wheat v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:WHEAT v . WASHINGTON

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 17, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 652 (1968)

Citing Cases

State v. Fullen

Of course, all of the circumstances surrounding the giving of the statements, and all other matters of…

Williams v. State

For a more recent decision reiterating the meaning of the statute, see Calloway v. State, 189 So.2d 617 at…