Summary
In W.G. Roe & Sons v. Razo-Guevara, 999 So.2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), this court held in no uncertain terms that this statutory provision does not apply to a claimant not being paid impairment benefits.
Summary of this case from Jones v. StateOpinion
No. 1D07-3598.
December 31, 2008. Rehearing Denied February 3, 2009.
Appeal from Judge of Compensation Claims, Mark H. Hofstad.
Harold E. Barker and Pat Dicesare of Dicesare Davidson Barker, Lakeland, for Appellant.
Bradley Guy Smith of Smith, Feddeler, Smith Miles, P.A., Lakeland; Susan W. Fox of Fox Loquasto, Tampa; Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox Loquasto, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier (E/C) appeal, and Claimant cross-appeals, an order granting some requests for indemnity benefits and denying others. We affirm the order in all respects except to the extent the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) limited his award of temporary total disability benefits to six months.
The JCC limited the award to six months by applying section 440.093(3), Florida Statutes (2004). This statute provides that, "[s]ubject to the payment of permanent benefits under s. 440.15, in no event shall temporary benefits for a compensable mental or nervous injury be paid for more than 6 months after the date of [physical MMI]. . . ." The scope of section 440.093(3), Florida Statutes, is an issue of first impression.
In construing a statute, courts must look to its plain language. See Fla. Dep't of Educ. v. Cooper, 858 So.2d 394, 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Subject [to] is defined as dependent on some act or condition. THE MERRIAM-WEBSTER DICTIONARY 712 (New ed., 2004). Thus, the six-month limitation on temporary psychiatric benefits is conditioned upon the payment of permanent benefits for the associated physical injury. This means the limitation does not apply unless permanent benefits are being paid. Because Claimant is not being paid permanent benefits, this statute does not apply here. Therefore, the JCC erred in applying it to limit Claimant's TTD benefits.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior Judge, concur.