From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westowne Shoes v. City Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Apr 11, 1996
82 F.3d 420 (7th Cir. 1996)

Summary

reversing convictions for co-defendants under Bailey

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Lampley

Opinion

95-2328.

April 11, 1996.

E.D.Wis.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Westowne Shoes v. City Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Apr 11, 1996
82 F.3d 420 (7th Cir. 1996)

reversing convictions for co-defendants under Bailey

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Lampley

addressing language in the pre-1986 CGL policy and recognizing the impulse to interpret "unfair competition" narrowly in light of the word advertising, rather than broadly as the modern law of business torts might allow

Summary of this case from Heritage Mutual Insurance Co. v. Advanced Polymer Tech., (S.D.Ind. 2000)
Case details for

Westowne Shoes v. City Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Westowne Shoes, Inc. v. City Ins. Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 1996

Citations

82 F.3d 420 (7th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Heritage Mutual Insurance Co. v. Advanced Polymer Tech., (S.D.Ind. 2000)

Environ has suffered injury or a likelihood of injury in terms of the loss of clearly understood title to the…

Wilson v. City of Milwaukee

Wilson further alleges that Schlachter, Sheehan, and Gibson forced him to participate in a lineup without an…