From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1988
525 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-923.

June 3, 1988.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Dale Durrance, Judge.


Robert Lee Watson timely appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Watson claims that although he received a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for firearm possession during an armed robbery, the codefendant, and not Watson, had actual possession of the firearm. It is well settled that the minimum mandatory sentence cannot be imposed for vicarious possession of a firearm. See Earnest v. State, 351 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1977); Brown v. State, 397 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). The trial judge summarily denied the motion, and failed to attach to his order portions of the record or file that refute Watson's allegations.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's denial of Watson's motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the files and records of the case conclusively show that Watson is entitled to no relief, the court shall order the state attorney to file an answer within a time certain. After receipt of the answer, the court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the court should again deny Watson's motion, he has thirty days in which to appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 3, 1988
525 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Watson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE WATSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 3, 1988

Citations

525 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

n challenging imposition of minimum mandatory on basis that defendant did not possess gun during robberies);…

Allen v. State

He alleges he did not possess a firearm during the robbery and therefore the minimum mandatory is improper.…