From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Inman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1992
596 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2134.

April 28, 1992.

An Appeal from a non-final order of the Circuit Court for Dade County; Maria M. Korvick, Judge.

Stuzin and Camner, and Mark E. Pollack, Miami, for appellants.

Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler, and Eric C. Christu, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellants complain that relief from execution, in the form of a stay on an ore tenus motion, was granted the appellee without compliance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.550(b). The record is devoid of the required motion for stay, notice of hearing and order granting a stay based on evidence and applicable substantive law. See Valdosta Milling Co. v. Garretson, 54 So.2d 196 (Fla. 1951); H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, Relief from Executions § 27-2 (1991 ed.).

For the reasons stated, the stay is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.


Summaries of

Watson v. Inman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1992
596 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Watson v. Inman

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. WATSON, III, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JEAN INMAN D/B/A JEAN INMAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 28, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Shortridge v. Allen

The claim of the intervenors was a stale demand. Rev. Stats., art. 3209; Flemming v. Reed, 37 Tex. 152 [ 37…

McCoy v. Pease

3. No possession being taken of the land in controversy by Johnston or his vendees, and no suit having been…